This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 03:07, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, nonsense.. probably not funny enough for bjaodn though. Megan1967 06:42, 12 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
nb the creator probably is aiming for a BJAODN - (s)he put a 'look at me' on its page  --Doc Glasgow 18:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In view of that, I change my vote to a straight delete. RickK 18:34, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, do not pass BJAODN. It uses the word "famousest". JRM · Talk 21:53, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
Above vote stricken as it contains no valid reasons for deletion. Vote changed to Delete, unverifiable. JRM · Talk 21:53, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
On second thought, I really do want it deleted for using "famousest". I'm willing to write a new policy proposal. JRM · Talk 21:53, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.